How Do I Report My Landlord To The Rogue Landlord Database

What the Rogue Landlord Database is (England)

The Rogue Landlord Database is a council-run enforcement tool, so tenants can’t add entries—but you can report concerns to your local council. You cannot add your landlord to the Rogue Landlord Database yourself. It’s a council enforcement tool, not a public reporting website. What you can do is report concerns to your local council, which can assess the facts, investigate, and (where legal tests are met) take enforcement action. The scheme applies to England, sits under the Housing and Planning Act 2016, and has statutory guidance in the Database of rogue landlords and property agents guidance on GOV.UK. Information only; not legal advice.

Clear facts, clean timelines, calmer outcomes.

Urgent help / get advice first (if you feel unsafe)

If you’re facing harassment, threats, illegal eviction, or immediate danger, prioritise safety and urgent support:

• Emergency: call 999.
• Non‑emergency police: call 101 (for ongoing harassment/threats).
• If you may become homeless soon, contact your council’s Housing Options/Homelessness team as early as possible.
• For independent housing guidance and help planning next steps, consider Shelter or Citizens Advice (especially if you’re unsure what to report, or worried about retaliation).

What it is and who it applies to

The Rogue Landlord Database is an England-only record used by councils as part of enforcement. It is not designed to be:

• A public “name and shame” list you can browse.
• A place where tenants post complaints for others to view.

A practical way to see the chain is:

• Your report: — what happened, when, and what you can show.
• Council investigation/enforcement: — inspection, checks, and formal decisions (where appropriate).
• Database entry: — only if the legal criteria are met as part of the council’s process.

Even where the threshold for a database entry isn’t met, a good report can still lead to outcomes like an inspection, hazard assessment, licensing checks, or formal notices requiring action.

Who can add entries (and who cannot)

Only local councils can add landlords or agents to the Rogue Landlord Database. There isn’t a tenant-facing route to create an entry directly.

Your role is to provide usable information the council can log, route, and verify. Two common avoidable delays:

• Feelings without dates: — understandable, but hard to action quickly.
• Evidence without labels: — lots of files, unclear what each proves.

Aim for scan-friendly basics (address, names, dates, a short timeline) so it doesn’t bounce between teams. If damp, mould, leaks, or ventilation are part of the situation, objective documentation helps keep attention on observable conditions, not arguments about blame.

Key documents and guidance you can refer to

The statutory guidance on GOV.UK explains how the database works and how councils use it. You don’t need to read it to report, but it can help set expectations: councils need evidence that supports the specific power they use and the steps they take.

If you want a simple structure many councils can work with, use three anchors:

• What you observed: — facts, dates, locations, impact.
• What you kept: — messages, photos, letters, call notes.
• What you want next: — inspection, licensing check, or enforcement review.

When councils can add a landlord or agent

Database entries are tied to defined legal triggers, so your report feeds enforcement—it doesn’t itself request or guarantee a listing. Councils can only add a landlord or agent when specific legal triggers are met. Your report is an input to investigation and enforcement, not an automatic “listing request.” The GOV.UK guidance sets out the legal criteria for database entries (including banning orders and certain convictions or civil penalties). Any entry depends on the outcome of the council’s process, not the act of reporting.

Mandatory entries (banning orders)

A banning order is a key mandatory trigger. Where a landlord or agent is subject to a banning order, the council must add an entry to the database.

Many reports sit earlier in the enforcement pathway, where councils may look at:

• Property condition and hazards.
• Licensing status (for example, House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) licensing where relevant).
• Whether notices, improvement requirements, or civil penalties apply.

So a “good” report is not one that demands the harshest outcome. It’s one that lets the council act lawfully and proportionately based on what your facts support.

Discretionary entries (certain convictions or repeated civil penalties)

Councils may add entries in certain cases involving specified convictions or repeated civil penalties. “May” signals discretion and case-by-case decisions, guided by evidence and the relevant legal test.

At a high level: the council’s enforcement outcome is what can lead to an entry, not the report itself. Your report helps when it is:

• Specific: — what happened, where, when.
• Consistent: — one clear timeline.
• Supported: — messages, photos, notes that match the timeline.

You’re not required to “prove the offence.” Your job is to help the council see what it can verify and which route fits.

What this means for your expectations as a tenant

Expect a process, not an instant, visible consequence. Your report can trigger triage and action, but it does not automatically place someone on the database.

Realistic outcomes after a well-made report can include:

• Advice/signposting to the correct team.
• A request for key details to open/allocate a case.
• Inspection and hazard assessment.
• Licensing checks.
• Possible enforcement where evidence supports formal steps.

A useful “success” metric is often: the council inspected, recorded, and required change—not whether you ever see a database entry.

How to report your landlord (step by step)

The fastest route to action is a short, well-labelled report to the right council team, built around facts, dates, and evidence. You report your landlord by contacting the right team at your local council, because councils investigate, choose the correct legal powers, and take enforcement action where appropriate. Your best chance of a timely response is a short, organised report that can be logged without repeated clarification. Aim to submit an actionable case file: clear summary, clear timeline, clearly labelled evidence.

Step 1: Identify the right council team

You get faster traction when your report lands with the team that matches the main issue. Councils often split responsibilities between housing conditions, licensing, and enforcement, and rerouting adds time.

Common team labels include “Private Sector Housing,” “Housing Standards,” “Environmental Health,” “HMO Licensing,” or “Enforcement.”

Step 1: Pick your primary problem

Choose the issue that needs action first (hazard, licensing, or conduct).

Step 2: Match to the council route

Use “conditions” routes for disrepair; use enforcement/specialist routes for harassment or illegal eviction.

Step 3: Confirm routing if unclear

A short call can prevent weeks of misdirection. Ask: “Which team owns this type of report, and what is the best email/form for evidence?”

Example of separate routes: Telford & Wrekin sets out distinct reporting for rogue landlord concerns and disrepair, including using a different disrepair reporting route.

Step 2: Submit your report (online form, email or phone)

Pick a channel that preserves a record, then keep everything in one thread or folder. Online forms are structured; email works well for attachments; phone can help confirm routing and urgency. If you report by phone, follow up in writing the same day.

Common routes:

• Online form: — best when standard fields are required.
• Email: — best when you have several attachments and an index.
• Phone: — best for routing and urgency checks.

Some councils publish contact options across multiple channels (Brighton & Hove, for example, provides a Private Sector Housing contact page with email/phone/post options).

A scan-friendly report header:

• Property address and postcode: (include flat number).
• Landlord/agent details: (names, trading name, contact methods used).
• One-paragraph summary: (what’s happening + what you want next).
• Timeline + evidence list: (dated events + numbered attachments).

Mini-template (email or form text)

• Subject: “Private rented property report — [address] — [main issue] — request for [inspection/licensing check/enforcement review]”
• First paragraph: “I’m a tenant at [address]. Since [date], I’ve experienced [issue]. I’ve asked the landlord/agent on [dates]. I’m requesting [inspection/licensing check] because [brief risk/impact].”
• Attachments: “Attachments 1–6 are listed at the end of this email.”

If damp, mould, leaks, or ventilation disputes are central, keep your description factual (locations, dates, progression) so an officer can verify it quickly.

Step 3: What to ask for after you report

Ask for process clarity, not promises:

• Confirmation your report is received and logged.
• A case/reference number (if used).
• What happens next and what they need from you.

Raise confidentiality early. Approaches vary by council and case type, so ask how confidentiality will be handled in your situation, and state your safe contact method and safe times.

Evidence to gather before you report

Evidence works best when it tells a clear story: what happened, when it happened, and what you can show to support it. Gather evidence so your report is easy to verify: who, what, where, when, and what you can show. You’re not trying to “prosecute” the case yourself—you’re giving the council enough credible material to triage risk, decide whether an inspection is justified, and choose proportionate steps. A simple “timeline + evidence index” often speeds things up.

Basic details to include in every report

Missing basics is one of the fastest ways for a report to stall. Include:

• Tenancy details: — start date, named tenants, who lives there.
• Landlord/agent details: — names, trading name, contact details used.
• Property address: — full address and postcode, including flat number.
• Timeline of events: — dated list of issues, requests, responses.
• Messages/letters: — emails, letters, screenshots, call notes.
• Photos/videos: — conditions, hazards, damage, changes over time.

If you don’t know something, say so. If a date is approximate, label it and anchor it to something you can evidence (an email, rent payment, etc.).

A structure that’s easy to process:

• One-paragraph summary + the outcome you want next.
• Dated timeline (one line per event).
• Attachment list (numbered files, one line each).

Documents and records that help an investigation

The goal isn’t volume; it’s verification. Helpful records often include:

• Photos from the same angle showing change over time.
• Screenshots showing full message threads (not single lines).
• Notes of calls (date/time/who/what was said).
• Evidence of access attempts (when you offered access; responses).

If you’re reporting multiple issue types, label them clearly so they can route internally.

Micro-scenario: you reported a leak three times and only received “next week” responses. You keep the full messages, take weekly photos of the same patch, and log each chase. That helps an officer see the pattern quickly.

If damp and mould are central, keep it factual:

• Location: — room/wall/ceiling/window reveal/floor.
• Pattern: — after rain/after heating/after “repairs”/constant.
• Progression: — when it spread or worsened (dated photos).
• Impact: — unusable space, persistent odour, damage.

How anonymity and contact preferences affect follow-up

Anonymity and confidentiality are not the same thing, and your choice affects what the council can do next. If an inspection requires access, questions, or follow-up evidence, it often helps if the council can contact you.

A practical middle ground is named reporting with clear preferences:

• State your safe contact method: — email-only, phone-only, or time windows.
• Ask how confidentiality will be handled: — and request confirmation in writing.

If you feel threatened or harassed, prioritise safety and seek urgent help first.

London: using the public Rogue Landlord and Agent Checker

In London you can search a public checker for some enforcement outcomes, but it won’t show every issue or prove compliance. If your property is in London, you can use the public Rogue landlord and agent checker to see certain recorded enforcement outcomes for landlords and agents. It is not a full history, and “no results” does not prove compliance. Use it for due diligence and to sharpen names/details in your report—not as a pass/fail test.

What the checker shows

The checker generally shows certain enforcement outcomes recorded in London, rather than tenant complaints. If a result appears, it can help confirm identities and the type of action recorded.

Examples include:

• Prosecuted or fined: by a London council.
• A prohibition notice: issued by the London Fire Brigade.
• Expelled from a mandatory consumer redress scheme: (agents).

Important limitations and how to interpret results

A clear search result is not a clean bill of health, and a match may not relate to your current situation. Key limitations include:

• Records show for a limited time and include a removal date.
• It covers only certain relevant housing offences/outcomes.
• A £0 fine can appear due to how combined fines are recorded.

Use it to improve accuracy in your report, not to decide whether the council should act.

How to report a London landlord or agent

For London properties, City Hall provides a reporting route that forwards submissions to the relevant borough council, as described in City Hall’s “Do you have a rogue landlord? Find out here” guidance. It’s for London properties and cannot process complaints outside London.

City Hall also notes anonymous reporting is possible, with a warning that anonymity may limit how far an investigation can go.

You can also report directly to your borough council using the same evidence pack. Using multiple routes does not guarantee action, but it can reduce delay if you’re unsure which team owns the issue.

What happens after you report (and typical outcomes)

After you report, progress is usually procedural first—triage, routing, and evidence checks—before you see inspections, notices, or repairs. After you report, the council may signpost you, request more information, inspect, route the case internally, or take enforcement action where justified. Councils are responsible for investigating and (where legal thresholds are met) can make database entries. Track progress by what happens procedurally—not by whether you can see a “listing.”

How councils may respond

Councils typically review reports to decide risk, ownership, and the best pathway. That stage can feel slow, but it often determines whether your case is advice-only, routed for inspection, or allocated to specialist enforcement.

Realistic outcomes include:

• Advice/signposting to the correct team or form.
• A request for key details to allocate the case.
• An inspection for hazards and health/safety concerns.
• Licensing checks if a licence may be required.
• Possible enforcement where evidence supports formal action.

Micro-scenario: you report severe damp plus aggressive messages. The council splits it between conditions and enforcement teams. It feels repetitive, but it can mean the right powers are being used for each issue.

How to follow up and keep a paper trail

Follow-up works best when it’s calm, consistent, and easy to process. Keep one folder containing:

• Your submitted report and attachments.
• Your timeline and evidence index.
• Council replies, reference numbers, call notes.

If you speak by phone, send a short written note the same day confirming what you said and what you understood the next step to be.

When requesting an update:

• Restate the address and reference number.
• Summarise the main risk in one or two lines.
• Ask for one clear process update (assigned officer, inspection booked, next step).

Progress often looks like paperwork before it looks like repairs.

Managing expectations about database entries

Treat a database entry as a possible downstream record of enforcement, not the main goal. Many valid reports will never result in an entry even if they lead to improvements, because entries require specific legal thresholds.

Better markers of progress:

• Your report is logged and owned by the right service.
• The council requests specific evidence or inspection access.
• You receive written confirmation of the pathway being used.
• You receive written outcomes or next steps (even if limited).

If your case is treated as “advice only,” ask what pathway it sits in and what procedural step would move it forward.

If the council or landlord does not act: escalation routes

When action stalls, escalation works best when it restores momentum: tighten the paper trail, use complaints channels, and get independent advice. If progress stalls, escalation works best when it restores a working process: keep evidence organised, use the council’s complaints route, and get independent housing advice when needed. Focus on procedural clarity—what you reported, when, what you provided, and what response you received—rather than demanding a specific sanction.

Council complaints and elected representatives

If your report has gone quiet, consider the council’s formal complaints process. Keep it short and evidence-led; attach your timeline and evidence index.

A complaint is easier to action when it states:

• What happened: — report date/method/summary.
• What stalled: — no response, misrouting, unclear ownership.
• What you need: — owner team + written next step.

You can also ask an elected representative to make an enquiry about delays (where appropriate). Keep the request focused on communication, routing, and timelines.

Micro-scenario: you’ve chased twice with no reply. You submit a complaint with your timeline attached and ask for the responsible team and next step in writing.

Other reporting options for specific issues

Sometimes “nothing is happening” means “it’s in the wrong lane.” Councils may split responsibilities across housing standards, licensing, and specialist enforcement.

Lewisham notes that some reports (including certain deposit protection concerns) may be handled via a specialist service rather than the same route used for property conditions—see its guidance on telling the council if your landlord is breaking the law.

If you suspect misrouting, resend the same facts with clearer routing:

• Hazards → housing standards/inspection route.
• Licensing → licensing/HMO pathway.
• Conduct/harassment → enforcement/specialist route.

Use this comparison to shape your subject line and opening paragraph.

Getting independent advice

Independent housing advice can help you choose safer next steps, especially if you feel threatened, you’re under pressure about eviction, or you’re unsure whether the main issue is disrepair, harassment, licensing, or deposit compliance.

If you feel threatened or harassed, prioritise urgent help from the appropriate authorities—don’t wait to “finish your evidence pack” before seeking support.

A London reminder: if the property is in London, the City Hall route exists. Outside London, your local council is the correct reporting route.

Book Your Consultation With Sussex Damp Experts Today

You’ll move fastest by submitting a tidy evidence pack to the right council team, because only councils can investigate and add database entries. You move this forward fastest by building a clear, dated evidence pack and submitting it to the right council team, because only councils can investigate and make any later Rogue Landlord Database entry.

If damp, mould, leaks, or ventilation disputes sit behind your report, a structured condition record can make the condition easier to verify and harder to dismiss. Sussex Damp Experts can help you document moisture-related conditions with clear observations, consistent photos, and a tidy written record that matches your timeline. We support evidence quality and clarity without promising a particular council outcome.

Frequently Asked Questions